FirePro W4300 vs GeForce GTX 295

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W4300 and GeForce GTX 295, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W4300 stacks up against GeForce GTX 295, check out specs charts below.

FirePro W4300 Check Price

GeForce GTX 295

Main Specs

	FirePro W4300	GeForce GTX 295
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	289 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	6-pin & 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1792 MB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI
	Check Price

GeForce GTX 295 has 478% more power consumption, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than FirePro W4300.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 312 MHz higher, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
FirePro W4300 is 161 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 5001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	8−9	2−3
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	20−22	7−8
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	18−20
medium / 1080p	24−27	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W4300 and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	200−210	120−130
medium / 768p	170−180	90−95
ultra / 1080p	95−100	40−45
QHD / 1440p	50−55	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	18−20
high / 768p	140−150	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	55−60	80−85
ultra / 1080p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
medium / 768p	90−95	50−55
ultra / 1080p	60−65	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	16−18	5−6
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Far Cry 5 is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	18−20	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	95−100	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Fortnite is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	24−27	7−8
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	20−22
medium / 1080p	27−30	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	85−90	45−50
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	27−30	8−9
ultra / 1080p	12−14	5−6
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 115% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	9−10	3−4
ultra / 1080p	7−8	1−2
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	8−9
medium / 1080p	12−14	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	100−110	80−85
medium / 1080p	100−110	85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	8−9
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	50−55	16−18
medium / 768p	30−35	12−14
high / 1080p	18−20	6−7
ultra / 1080p	10−12	5−6
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	16−18
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 295.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4300	GeForce GTX 295
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Code name	Bonaire	GT200B
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 December 2015	8 January 2009
Pipelines	768	240
Core clock speed	930 MHz	1242 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million	1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Texture fill rate	44.64	92.2 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops	2x 596.2 gflops
Length	171 mm	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width	128 Bit	896 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	999 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	223.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.3	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		+
CUDA cores		480
Height		4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options		+
Multi monitor support		+
HDMI		+
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI		S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	152 Mh/s
CUDA cores per GPU		240
Standard memory config per GPU		896 MB
Memory interface width per GPU		448 Bit
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)		128bit
	Check Price

FirePro W4300 vs GeForce GTX 295

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares