FirePro W4300 vs GeForce MX110

When choosing between FirePro W4300 and GeForce MX110, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W4300 and GeForce MX110.

FirePro W4300 Check Price

GeForce MX110 Check Price

GeForce MX110 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce MX110 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX110 here:

GeForce MX110 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W4300	GeForce MX110
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5/DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4300 has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce MX110.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro W4300 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX110.
FirePro W4300 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX110 - in Laptops.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX110 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX110 is 35 MHz higher, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 and GeForce MX110 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 4200 MHz higher, than GeForce MX110.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	6−7
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	16−18
medium / 1080p	18−20	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce MX110.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	20−22	10−11
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	24−27
medium / 1080p	24−27	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Battlefield 5 is 106% more, than GeForce MX110.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W4300 and GeForce MX110 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	200−210	130−140
medium / 768p	170−180	110−120
ultra / 1080p	95−100	50−55
QHD / 1440p	50−55	27−30
4K / 2160p	30−33	27−30
high / 768p	140−150	80−85
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 60% more, than GeForce MX110.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than GeForce MX110.
low / 768p	110−120	80−85
medium / 768p	90−95	55−60
ultra / 1080p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 57% more, than GeForce MX110.
high / 1080p	16−18	8−9
ultra / 1080p	16−18	7−8
4K / 2160p	6−7	3−4
low / 720p	35−40	18−20
medium / 1080p	18−20	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Far Cry 5 is 111% more, than GeForce MX110.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	18−20	10−11
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	95−100	60−65
medium / 1080p	50−55	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Fortnite is 77% more, than GeForce MX110.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	20−22	10−12
QHD / 1440p	9−10	1−2
low / 720p	50−55	24−27
medium / 1080p	27−30	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than GeForce MX110.
low / 768p	85−90	50−55
medium / 768p	75−80	45−50
high / 1080p	27−30	12−14
ultra / 1080p	12−14	6−7
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GeForce MX110.
high / 1080p	9−10	4−5
ultra / 1080p	7−8	3−4
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	12−14
medium / 1080p	12−14	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than GeForce MX110.
low / 768p	110−120	95−100
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	100−110	80−85
medium / 1080p	100−110	90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce MX110.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	30−35
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than GeForce MX110.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	12−14
medium / 1080p	16−18	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than GeForce MX110.
low / 768p	50−55	24−27
medium / 768p	30−35	16−18
high / 1080p	18−20	9−10
ultra / 1080p	10−12	6−7
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 84% more, than GeForce MX110.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
medium / 768p	60−65	45−50
ultra / 1080p	35−40	18−20
high / 768p	50−55	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 36% more, than GeForce MX110.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4300	GeForce MX110
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Maxwell
Code name	Bonaire	N16V-GMR1
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 December 2015	1 January 2018
Pipelines	768	256
Core clock speed	930 MHz	965 MHz
Boost Clock		993 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	44.64	23.83
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops	762.6 gflops
Length	171 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	40.1 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	152 Mh/s
Optimus		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4300 vs GeForce MX110

GeForce MX110 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares