FirePro W4300 vs NVS 510

When comparing FirePro W4300 and NVS 510, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4300 and NVS 510 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

• FirePro W4300 has 42% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
• FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and NVS 510 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
• FirePro W4300 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
• Both cards are used in Desktops.
• FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and NVS 510 - with Kepler.
• Core clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 133 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
• FirePro W4300 and NVS 510 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
• FirePro W4300 is 11 mm longer, than NVS 510.
• Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 4218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.