FirePro W4300 vs Quadro 2000M
In this comparison between FirePro W4300 and Quadro 2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4300 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4300
Quadro 2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 2000M has 10% more power consumption, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro W4300 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
FirePro W4300 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 380 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
FirePro W4300 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 5100 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
0−1
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
1−2
medium / 1080p
18−20
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
0−1
medium / 1080p
24−27
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
200−210
60−65
medium / 768p
170−180
27−30
ultra / 1080p
95−100
7−8
QHD / 1440p
50−55
−
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
140−150
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 453% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
110−120
45−50
medium / 768p
90−95
10−11
ultra / 1080p
60−65
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
95−100
21−24
medium / 1080p
50−55
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
0−1
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
0−1
medium / 1080p
27−30
0−1
low / 768p
85−90
18−20
medium / 768p
75−80
−
high / 1080p
27−30
0−1
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 720p
55−60
8−9
medium / 1080p
24−27
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 768p
50−55
0−1
medium / 768p
30−35
−
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 768p
100−110
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
35−40
0−1
high / 768p
50−55
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4300
Quadro 2000M
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Fermi
Code name
Bonaire
Fermi
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 December 2015
22 February 2011
Pipelines
768
192
Core clock speed
930 MHz
550 MHz
Transistor count
2,080 million
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
44.64
17.60
Floating-point performance
1,428 gflops
422.4 gflops
Length
171 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.3
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
152 Mh/s
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price