FirePro W4300 vs Quadro 3000M
In this comparison between FirePro W4300 and Quadro 3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4300 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4300
Quadro 3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 3000M has 50% more power consumption, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
FirePro W4300 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
FirePro W4300 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 480 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
FirePro W4300 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 5375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
2−3
ultra / 1080p
8−9
1−2
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
12−14
medium / 1080p
18−20
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
20−22
5−6
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
16−18
medium / 1080p
24−27
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
200−210
120−130
medium / 768p
170−180
95−100
ultra / 1080p
95−100
40−45
QHD / 1440p
50−55
21−24
4K / 2160p
30−33
16−18
high / 768p
140−150
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
35−40
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
medium / 768p
90−95
45−50
ultra / 1080p
60−65
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 83% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
2−3
ultra / 1080p
16−18
2−3
4K / 2160p
6−7
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
10−12
medium / 1080p
18−20
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
95−100
50−55
medium / 1080p
50−55
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Fortnite is 162% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
5−6
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
QHD / 1440p
9−10
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
50−55
18−20
medium / 1080p
27−30
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
45−50
medium / 768p
75−80
−
high / 1080p
27−30
4−5
ultra / 1080p
12−14
2−3
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
2−3
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
4−5
medium / 1080p
12−14
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
27−30
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
6−7
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
10−11
medium / 768p
30−35
8−9
high / 1080p
18−20
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−12
4−5
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
14−16
high / 768p
50−55
30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 60% more, than Quadro 3000M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4300
Quadro 3000M
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Fermi
Code name
Bonaire
Fermi
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 December 2015
22 February 2011
Pipelines
768
240
Core clock speed
930 MHz
450 MHz
Transistor count
2,080 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
44.64
18.00
Floating-point performance
1,428 gflops
432.0 gflops
Length
171 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.3
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
152 Mh/s
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
