FirePro W4300 vs Quadro K2200M

When choosing between FirePro W4300 and Quadro K2200M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W4300 and Quadro K2200M.

FirePro W4300 Check Price

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	FirePro W4300	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

Quadro K2200M has 30% more power consumption, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro W4300 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 263 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 988 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	20−22
ultra / 1080p	8−9	12−14
QHD / 1440p	3−4	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	20−22	27−30
QHD / 1440p	7−8	10−12
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	50−55	65−70
medium / 1080p	24−27	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	200−210	230−240
medium / 768p	170−180	200−210
ultra / 1080p	95−100	110−120
QHD / 1440p	50−55	85−90
4K / 2160p	30−33	45−50
high / 768p	140−150	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	60−65	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 13% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	16−18	24−27
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
low / 720p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 36% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	18−20	24−27
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	95−100	120−130
medium / 1080p	50−55	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 28% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	20−22	24−27
QHD / 1440p	9−10	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	50−55	65−70
medium / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
medium / 768p	75−80	90−95
high / 1080p	27−30	40−45
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
QHD / 1440p	3−4	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	9−10	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 41% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 9% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	70−75
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	50−55	70−75
medium / 768p	30−35	45−50
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	14−16
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	40−45
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro K2200M.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4300	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Maxwell
Code name	Bonaire	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 December 2015	19 July 2014
Pipelines	768	640
Core clock speed	930 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	44.64	26.68
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops	853.8 gflops
Length	171 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12
Shader Model	6.3	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	152 Mh/s
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
	Check Price

FirePro W4300 vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares