FirePro W4300 vs Quadro K5100M

In this comparison between FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4300 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W4300 Check Price

Quadro K5100M Check Price

Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:

Quadro K5100M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W4300	Quadro K5100M
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K5100M has 100% more power consumption, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K5100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K5100M has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5100M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K5100M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 159 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	8−9
QHD / 1440p	3−4	3−4
low / 720p	30−35	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	20−22	20−22
QHD / 1440p	7−8	7−8
4K / 2160p	5−6	5−6
low / 720p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	24−27	24−27
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	200−210	200−210
medium / 768p	170−180	170−180
ultra / 1080p	95−100	95−100
QHD / 1440p	50−55	50−55
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	140−150	130−140
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 0% more, than Quadro K5100M.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	110−120	100−110
medium / 768p	90−95	90−95
ultra / 1080p	60−65	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Quadro K5100M.
high / 1080p	16−18	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	16−18
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	95−100	95−100
medium / 1080p	50−55	50−55
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	20−22	20−22
QHD / 1440p	9−10	8−9
low / 720p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	27−30	27−30
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p	85−90	80−85
medium / 768p	75−80	75−80
high / 1080p	27−30	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
QHD / 1440p	3−4	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Quadro K5100M.
high / 1080p	9−10	9−10
ultra / 1080p	7−8	7−8
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	27−30
medium / 1080p	12−14	12−14
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	55−60
medium / 1080p	24−27	24−27
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	27−30
medium / 1080p	16−18	16−18
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
medium / 768p	30−35	30−35
high / 1080p	18−20	18−20
ultra / 1080p	10−12	10−12
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p	100−110	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	30−35
high / 768p	50−55	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro K5100M.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4300	Quadro K5100M
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Kepler
Code name	Bonaire	N15E-Q5-A2
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 December 2015	23 July 2013
Pipelines	768	1536
Core clock speed	930 MHz	771 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	44.64	98.69
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops	2,369 gflops
Length	171 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	115.2 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12
Shader Model	6.3	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	152 Mh/s	35 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4300 vs Quadro K5100M

Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares