FirePro W4300 vs Radeon 520

In this comparison between FirePro W4300 and Radeon 520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4300 will be the best choice, for others Radeon 520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W4300 Check Price

Radeon 520 Check Price

Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:

Radeon 520 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W4300	Radeon 520
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
	Check Price	Check Price

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 50 Watt.
FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
FirePro W4300 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon 520.
FirePro W4300 is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 100 MHz higher, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 and Radeon 520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 3750 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	0−1
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	1−2
medium / 1080p	18−20	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	0−1
medium / 1080p	24−27	−
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	200−210	55−60
medium / 768p	170−180	30−33
ultra / 1080p	95−100	6−7
QHD / 1440p	50−55	−
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	140−150	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 453% more, than Radeon 520.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	35−40	0−1
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	110−120	45−50
medium / 768p	90−95	10−11
ultra / 1080p	60−65	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	35−40	0−1
medium / 1080p	18−20	−
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	95−100	21−24
medium / 1080p	50−55	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p	24−27	0−1
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	0−1
medium / 1080p	27−30	0−1
low / 768p	85−90	18−20
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	27−30	0−1
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p	9−10	−
ultra / 1080p	7−8	−
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	27−30	0−1
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
low / 720p	55−60	10−11
medium / 1080p	24−27	10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 310% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	0−1
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
low / 768p	50−55	0−1
medium / 768p	30−35	−
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	10−12	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 768p	100−110	45−50
medium / 768p	60−65	14−16
ultra / 1080p	35−40	0−1
high / 768p	50−55	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than Radeon 520.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4300	Radeon 520
Architecture	GCN 2.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Bonaire	Oland
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 December 2015	21 March 2017
Pipelines	768	320
Core clock speed	930 MHz	1030 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million	1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	44.64	20.60
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops	659.2 gflops
Length	171 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	16 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12.0
Shader Model	6.3	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	152 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon 520

Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares