FirePro W4300 vs Radeon HD 6990M

When comparing FirePro W4300 and Radeon HD 6990M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4300 and Radeon HD 6990M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro W4300 Check Price

Radeon HD 6990M Check Price

Radeon HD 6990M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon HD 6990M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6990M here:

Radeon HD 6990M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W4300	Radeon HD 6990M
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon HD 6990M has 100% more power consumption, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6990M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
FirePro W4300 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6990M.
FirePro W4300 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6990M - in Laptops.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6990M - with Terascale 2.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 215 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6990M.
FirePro W4300 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6990M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 5100 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6990M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	8−9
QHD / 1440p	3−4	3−4
low / 720p	30−35	30−33
medium / 1080p	18−20	16−18
FirePro W4300 and Radeon HD 6990M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	20−22	18−20
QHD / 1440p	7−8	6−7
4K / 2160p	5−6	5−6
low / 720p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	24−27	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than Radeon HD 6990M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W4300 and Radeon HD 6990M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	200−210	200−210
medium / 768p	170−180	170−180
ultra / 1080p	95−100	90−95
QHD / 1440p	50−55	50−55
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	140−150	130−140
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Radeon HD 6990M.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
FirePro W4300 and Radeon HD 6990M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	110−120	100−110
medium / 768p	90−95	90−95
ultra / 1080p	60−65	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon HD 6990M.
high / 1080p	16−18	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
FirePro W4300 and Radeon HD 6990M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	95−100	95−100
medium / 1080p	50−55	50−55
FirePro W4300 and Radeon HD 6990M have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	20−22	18−20
QHD / 1440p	9−10	8−9
low / 720p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	27−30	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Forza Horizon 4 is 3% more, than Radeon HD 6990M.
low / 768p	85−90	80−85
medium / 768p	75−80	70−75
high / 1080p	27−30	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−12
QHD / 1440p	3−4	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than Radeon HD 6990M.
high / 1080p	9−10	9−10
ultra / 1080p	7−8	7−8
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	27−30
medium / 1080p	12−14	12−14
FirePro W4300 and Radeon HD 6990M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
FirePro W4300 and Radeon HD 6990M have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	55−60
medium / 1080p	24−27	24−27
FirePro W4300 and Radeon HD 6990M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	27−30
medium / 1080p	16−18	16−18
FirePro W4300 and Radeon HD 6990M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
medium / 768p	30−35	30−35
high / 1080p	18−20	18−20
ultra / 1080p	10−12	10−11
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
FirePro W4300 and Radeon HD 6990M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p	100−110	100−105
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	30−35
high / 768p	50−55	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon HD 6990M.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4300	Radeon HD 6990M
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Terascale 2
Code name	Bonaire	Blackcomb XTX
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 December 2015	12 July 2011
Pipelines	768	1120
Core clock speed	930 MHz	715 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million	1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	44.64	40.04
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops	1,601.6 gflops
Length	171 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	115.2 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (12_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	152 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon HD 6990M

Radeon HD 6990M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares