FirePro W4300 vs Radeon HD 8790M

In this comparison between FirePro W4300 and Radeon HD 8790M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4300 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 8790M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W4300 Check Price

Radeon HD 8790M Check Price

Radeon HD 8790M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon HD 8790M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8790M here:

Radeon HD 8790M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W4300	Radeon HD 8790M
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8790M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro W4300 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8790M.
FirePro W4300 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8790M - in Laptops.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 8790M - with GCN.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 80 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8790M.
FirePro W4300 and Radeon HD 8790M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 1500 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8790M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	8−9	1−2
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Radeon HD 8790M.
high / 1080p	24−27	8−9
ultra / 1080p	20−22	6−7
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	24−27	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Battlefield 5 is 181% more, than Radeon HD 8790M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W4300 and Radeon HD 8790M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	200−210	120−130
medium / 768p	170−180	100−110
ultra / 1080p	95−100	50−55
QHD / 1440p	50−55	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	140−150	75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Radeon HD 8790M.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	35−40	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon HD 8790M.
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
medium / 768p	90−95	55−60
ultra / 1080p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Radeon HD 8790M.
high / 1080p	16−18	4−5
ultra / 1080p	16−18	4−5
4K / 2160p	6−7	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than Radeon HD 8790M.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	18−20	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	95−100	60−65
medium / 1080p	50−55	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Fortnite is 100% more, than Radeon HD 8790M.
high / 1080p	24−27	8−9
ultra / 1080p	20−22	7−8
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	27−30	10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than Radeon HD 8790M.
low / 768p	85−90	50−55
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	27−30	10−11
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than Radeon HD 8790M.
high / 1080p	9−10	2−3
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	9−10
medium / 1080p	12−14	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than Radeon HD 8790M.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	70−75
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon HD 8790M.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	30−35
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Radeon HD 8790M.
high / 1080p	14−16	7−8
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	8−9
medium / 1080p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than Radeon HD 8790M.
low / 768p	50−55	20−22
medium / 768p	30−35	12−14
high / 1080p	18−20	7−8
ultra / 1080p	10−12	5−6
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than Radeon HD 8790M.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	60−65	40−45
ultra / 1080p	35−40	18−20
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Radeon HD 8790M.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4300	Radeon HD 8790M
Architecture	GCN 2.0	GCN
Code name	Bonaire	Mars XTX
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 December 2015	16 November 2012
Pipelines	768	384
Core clock speed	930 MHz	850 MHz
Boost Clock		900 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	44.64	21.60
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops	691.2 gflops
Length	171 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.3	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	152 Mh/s	80 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon HD 8790M

Radeon HD 8790M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares