FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R7 250

When choosing between FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 250, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 250.

FirePro W4300 Check Price

Radeon R7 250 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W4300	Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	N/A
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 250 has 50% more power consumption, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
FirePro W4300 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 250.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 250 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro W4300 is 3 mm longer, than Radeon R7 250.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 4850 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	8−9	1−2
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	24−27	6−7
ultra / 1080p	20−22	4−5
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	18−20
medium / 1080p	24−27	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Battlefield 5 is 244% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	200−210	120−130
medium / 768p	170−180	90−95
ultra / 1080p	95−100	45−50
QHD / 1440p	50−55	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	140−150	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	110−120	80−85
medium / 768p	90−95	55−60
ultra / 1080p	60−65	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 60% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	16−18	4−5
ultra / 1080p	16−18	4−5
4K / 2160p	6−7	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−12
ultra / 1080p	18−20	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	1−2
low / 720p	95−100	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Fortnite is 147% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	24−27	8−9
ultra / 1080p	20−22	7−8
QHD / 1440p	9−10	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	27−30	10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Forza Horizon 4 is 170% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	85−90	45−50
medium / 768p	75−80	35−40
high / 1080p	27−30	8−9
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 112% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	9−10	2−3
ultra / 1080p	7−8	1−2
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	9−10
medium / 1080p	12−14	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	110−120	90−95
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	100−110	80−85
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	14−16	5−6
ultra / 1080p	9−10	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	7−8
medium / 1080p	16−18	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	50−55	18−20
medium / 768p	30−35	12−14
high / 1080p	18−20	6−7
ultra / 1080p	10−12	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	16−18
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 64% more, than Radeon R7 250.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4300	Radeon R7 250
Architecture	GCN 2.0	GCN
Code name	Bonaire	Oland XT
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 December 2015	1 October 2013
Pipelines	768	384
Core clock speed	930 MHz
Boost Clock		1050 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	44.64	25.20
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops	716.8 gflops
Length	171 mm	168 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	152 Mh/s	117 Mh/s
Design		reference
CrossFire		+
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R7 250

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares