FirePro W4300 vs Tesla C2050
When choosing between FirePro W4300 and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W4300 and Tesla C2050.
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
FirePro W4300
Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
238 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
3 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2050 has 376% more power consumption, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W4300 has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 356 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
FirePro W4300 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2050 is 77 mm longer, than FirePro W4300.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 3000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
24−27
QHD / 1440p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
200−210
220−230
medium / 768p
170−180
190−200
ultra / 1080p
95−100
110−120
QHD / 1440p
50−55
70−75
4K / 2160p
30−33
35−40
high / 768p
140−150
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
95−100
110−120
medium / 1080p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 14% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
24−27
30−35
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
9−10
10−12
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
75−80
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
FirePro W4300 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
50−55
65−70
medium / 768p
30−35
40−45
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tesla C2050.
Full Specs
FirePro W4300
Tesla C2050
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Fermi
Code name
Bonaire
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 December 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
768
448
Core clock speed
930 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
2,080 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
44.64
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,428 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
171 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
144.0 GB/s
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.3
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
152 Mh/s
90 Mh/s
Check Price
