FirePro W4300 vs Tesla C2075
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W4300 and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W4300 and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Main Specs
FirePro W4300
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 394% more power consumption, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4300.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 356 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro W4300 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 77 mm longer, than FirePro W4300.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 2868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
7−8
6−7
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
200−210
210−220
medium / 768p
170−180
190−200
ultra / 1080p
95−100
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
140−150
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
95−100
110−120
medium / 1080p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 14% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
9−10
10−11
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
75−80
80−85
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
30−35
35−40
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
FirePro W4300
Tesla C2075
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Bonaire
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 December 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
768
448
Core clock speed
930 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
2,080 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
44.64
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,428 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
171 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.3
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
152 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
