FirePro W4300 vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between FirePro W4300 and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4300 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
FirePro W4300
Tesla M2070 Q
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Tesla M2070 Q has 350% more power consumption, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4300.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 356 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
FirePro W4300 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla M2070 Q is 77 mm longer, than FirePro W4300.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 2868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
3−4
ultra / 1080p
8−9
1−2
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
14−16
medium / 1080p
18−20
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
24−27
8−9
ultra / 1080p
20−22
6−7
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
24−27
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Battlefield 5 is 181% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W4300 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
200−210
120−130
medium / 768p
170−180
100−110
ultra / 1080p
95−100
50−55
QHD / 1440p
50−55
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
140−150
75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
medium / 768p
90−95
55−60
ultra / 1080p
60−65
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
16−18
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
1−2
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
18−20
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
18−20
7−8
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
95−100
60−65
medium / 1080p
50−55
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Fortnite is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
24−27
8−9
ultra / 1080p
20−22
7−8
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
27−30
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
85−90
50−55
medium / 768p
75−80
−
high / 1080p
27−30
10−11
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
9−10
2−3
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
9−10
medium / 1080p
12−14
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
70−75
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
14−16
7−8
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
8−9
medium / 1080p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
50−55
20−22
medium / 768p
30−35
12−14
high / 1080p
18−20
7−8
ultra / 1080p
10−12
5−6
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
40−45
ultra / 1080p
35−40
18−20
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Full Specs
FirePro W4300
Tesla M2070 Q
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Fermi
Code name
Bonaire
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 December 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
768
448
Core clock speed
930 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
2,080 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
44.64
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,428 gflops
1,027.7 gflops
Length
171 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.3
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
152 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Check Price
