FirePro W5000 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE

In this comparison between FirePro W5000 and GeForce GTX 560 SE you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 560 SE will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W5000 Check Price

GeForce GTX 560 SE Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W5000	GeForce GTX 560 SE
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 560 SE has 100% more power consumption, than FirePro W5000.
FirePro W5000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 560 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W5000 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 560 SE - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro W5000 is 89 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
FirePro W5000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 560 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
GeForce GTX 560 SE is 27 mm longer, than FirePro W5000.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 560 SE is 628 MHz higher, than FirePro W5000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	9−10
ultra / 1080p	9−10	5−6
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	21−24
medium / 1080p	18−20	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	21−24	12−14
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	30−35
medium / 1080p	27−30	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W5000 and GeForce GTX 560 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	160−170
medium / 768p	180−190	130−140
ultra / 1080p	95−100	65−70
QHD / 1440p	50−55	35−40
4K / 2160p	30−33	27−30
high / 768p	140−150	100−105
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	40−45	24−27
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p	110−120	90−95
medium / 768p	90−95	70−75
ultra / 1080p	60−65	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p	18−20	10−12
ultra / 1080p	16−18	10−11
4K / 2160p	6−7	4−5
low / 720p	35−40	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p	24−27	16−18
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	95−100	70−75
medium / 1080p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Fortnite is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p	24−27	16−18
ultra / 1080p	20−22	12−14
QHD / 1440p	9−10	3−4
low / 720p	50−55	30−35
medium / 1080p	27−30	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p	85−90	60−65
medium / 768p	75−80	55−60
high / 1080p	30−33	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	8−9
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p	9−10	6−7
ultra / 1080p	7−8	4−5
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	27−30	16−18
medium / 1080p	12−14	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p	110−120	100−105
high / 1080p	−	95−100
ultra / 1080p	100−110	85−90
medium / 1080p	100−110	95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p	21−24	18−20
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	40−45
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	16−18
medium / 1080p	16−18	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p	55−60	30−35
medium / 768p	30−35	21−24
high / 1080p	18−20	12−14
ultra / 1080p	10−12	7−8
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	50−55
ultra / 1080p	35−40	24−27
high / 768p	50−55	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.

Full Specs

	FirePro W5000	GeForce GTX 560 SE
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Pitcairn	GF114
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	7 August 2012	20 February 2012
Pipelines	768	288
Core clock speed	825 MHz	736 MHz
Transistor count	2,800 million	1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	39.60	35.33
Floating-point performance	1,267 gflops	847.9 gflops
Length	183 mm	210 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz	3828 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.4 GB/s	91.87 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.1
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	154 Mh/s	54 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / half length
DisplayPort count	2
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W5000 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares