FirePro W5000 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When comparing FirePro W5000 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W5000 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5000
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W5000 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
FirePro W5000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
FirePro W5000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
FirePro W5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of FirePro W5000 is 525 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
FirePro W5000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
4−5
ultra / 1080p
9−10
3−4
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
12−14
medium / 1080p
18−20
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
21−24
7−8
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
16−18
medium / 1080p
27−30
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W5000 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
110−120
medium / 768p
180−190
85−90
ultra / 1080p
95−100
40−45
QHD / 1440p
50−55
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
140−150
60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 110% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
70−75
medium / 768p
90−95
45−50
ultra / 1080p
60−65
24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Dota 2 is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
18−20
6−7
ultra / 1080p
16−18
5−6
4K / 2160p
6−7
3−4
low / 720p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
18−20
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Far Cry 5 is 171% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
18−20
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
95−100
50−55
medium / 1080p
50−55
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Fortnite is 118% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
24−27
9−10
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
18−20
medium / 1080p
27−30
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 169% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
40−45
medium / 768p
75−80
35−40
high / 1080p
30−33
8−9
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
3−4
ultra / 1080p
7−8
2−3
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
8−9
medium / 1080p
12−14
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Minecraft is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
24−27
medium / 1080p
24−27
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 72% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
8−9
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
16−18
medium / 768p
30−35
12−14
high / 1080p
18−20
7−8
ultra / 1080p
10−12
5−6
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
100−110
80−85
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
14−16
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in World of Tanks is 56% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
FirePro W5000
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
Pitcairn
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
7 August 2012
2 June 2015
Pipelines
768
48
Core clock speed
825 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
39.60
40.80
Floating-point performance
1,267 gflops
883.2 gflops
Length
183 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.80
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
154 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Form factor
full height / half length
DisplayPort count
2
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price
