FirePro W5000 vs Quadro 5000M
In this comparison between FirePro W5000 and Quadro 5000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 5000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5000
Quadro 5000M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 5000M has 33% more power consumption, than FirePro W5000.
FirePro W5000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
FirePro W5000 and Quadro 5000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro W5000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro 5000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W5000 is 420 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
FirePro W5000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 5000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W5000 is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
10−11
ultra / 1080p
9−10
6−7
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
21−24
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 46% more, than Quadro 5000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
35−40
medium / 1080p
27−30
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than Quadro 5000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W5000 and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
170−180
medium / 768p
180−190
140−150
ultra / 1080p
95−100
70−75
QHD / 1440p
50−55
40−45
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−33
high / 768p
140−150
100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than Quadro 5000M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro 5000M.
low / 768p
110−120
95−100
medium / 768p
90−95
75−80
ultra / 1080p
60−65
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Quadro 5000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
16−18
10−12
4K / 2160p
6−7
4−5
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Far Cry 5 is 35% more, than Quadro 5000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
95−100
75−80
medium / 1080p
50−55
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Fortnite is 29% more, than Quadro 5000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
20−22
14−16
QHD / 1440p
9−10
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
35−40
medium / 1080p
27−30
20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than Quadro 5000M.
low / 768p
85−90
65−70
medium / 768p
75−80
55−60
high / 1080p
30−33
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Quadro 5000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro 5000M.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
90−95
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro 5000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
40−45
medium / 1080p
24−27
20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Quadro 5000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
18−20
medium / 1080p
16−18
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Quadro 5000M.
low / 768p
55−60
35−40
medium / 768p
30−35
21−24
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−12
8−9
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than Quadro 5000M.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
35−40
24−27
high / 768p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Quadro 5000M.
Full Specs
FirePro W5000
Quadro 5000M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi
Code name
Pitcairn
Fermi
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
7 August 2012
27 July 2010
Pipelines
768
320
Core clock speed
825 MHz
405 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
39.60
16.20
Floating-point performance
1,267 gflops
518.4 gflops
Length
183 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
154 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Form factor
full height / half length
DisplayPort count
2
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price
