FirePro W5000 vs Quadro K1000M

When comparing FirePro W5000 and Quadro K1000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W5000 and Quadro K1000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro W5000 Check Price

Quadro K1000M Check Price

Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:

Quadro K1000M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W5000	Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	45 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W5000 has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
FirePro W5000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro W5000 and Quadro K1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro W5000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 25 MHz higher, than FirePro W5000.
FirePro W5000 and Quadro K1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W5000 is 1400 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	0−1
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	1−2
medium / 1080p	18−20	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	−
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	0−1
medium / 1080p	27−30	−
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	210−220	60−65
medium / 768p	180−190	27−30
ultra / 1080p	95−100	7−8
QHD / 1440p	50−55	−
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	140−150	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 471% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	0−1
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	110−120	45−50
medium / 768p	90−95	10−11
ultra / 1080p	60−65	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	35−40	0−1
medium / 1080p	18−20	−
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	95−100	21−24
medium / 1080p	50−55	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	24−27	0−1
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	0−1
medium / 1080p	27−30	0−1
low / 768p	85−90	18−20
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	30−33	0−1
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	9−10	−
ultra / 1080p	7−8	−
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	27−30	0−1
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
low / 720p	55−60	8−9
medium / 1080p	24−27	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	0−1
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
low / 768p	55−60	0−1
medium / 768p	30−35	−
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	10−12	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 768p	100−110	45−50
medium / 768p	60−65	14−16
ultra / 1080p	35−40	0−1
high / 768p	50−55	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than Quadro K1000M.

Full Specs

	FirePro W5000	Quadro K1000M
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Pitcairn	N14P-Q1
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	7 August 2012	1 June 2012
Pipelines	768	192
Core clock speed	825 MHz	850 MHz
Transistor count	2,800 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	39.60	13.60
Floating-point performance	1,267 gflops	326.4 gflops
Length	183 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.4 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		+
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	154 Mh/s	10 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
Optimus		+
Form factor	full height / half length
DisplayPort count	2
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W5000 vs Quadro K1000M

Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares