FirePro W5100 vs GeForce 820A
When comparing FirePro W5100 and GeForce 820A, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W5100 and GeForce 820A is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W5100
GeForce 820A
Main Specs
| FirePro W5100 | GeForce 820A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- FirePro W5100 has 233% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 820A uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W5100 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce 820A - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 155 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- FirePro W5100 and GeForce 820A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4200 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 475% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5100 | GeForce 820A | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Bonaire | GF117 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 31 March 2014 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 585 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 12.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Form factor | full height / half length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |