FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GT 645M
In this comparison between FirePro W5100 and GeForce GT 645M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5100 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GT 645M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W5100
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GT 645M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 32 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W5100 has 56% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W5100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 645M.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 645M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 645M - with Kepler.
- FirePro W5100 and GeForce GT 645M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 385% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 117% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 233% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 375% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 68% more, than GeForce GT 645M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GT 645M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Bonaire | N13P-GS |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 22.7 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 544.5 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 19 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R7 260X
- FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon R7 260X
- GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- FirePro W5100 vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro CX