FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTS 160M
When comparing FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTS 160M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTS 160M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W5100
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTS 160M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 160M has 20% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTS 160M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W5100 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTS 160M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTS 160M - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 570 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTS 160M - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 475% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTS 160M | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | G9x |
| Code name | Bonaire | N10E-GS1 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 March 2014 | 2 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 64 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 505 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 19 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 192 gflops |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / half length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Gigaflops | 288 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| Check Price |