FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
When choosing between FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 460 SE, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 460 SE.
FirePro W5100
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Main Specs
| FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 200% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W5100 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 370 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- FirePro W5100 is 163 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Bonaire | GF104 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 31 March 2014 | 15 November 2010 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 288 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 31.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
| Length | 171 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
| Form factor | full height / half length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |