FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 480M
When comparing FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 480M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 480M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W5100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 480M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 480M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 480M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 480M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 480M has 100% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 480M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W5100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 480M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 480M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 80 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 480M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 480M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 480M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Bonaire | N11E-GTX-A3 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 25 May 2010 |
Pipelines | 768 | 352 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 18.7 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 598.4 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |