FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 760M
In this comparison between FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 760M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5100 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 760M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W5100
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 760M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760M has 10% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W5100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 760M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 760M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 273 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 760M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 760M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 760M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Bonaire | N14E-GL |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 30 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 657 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 42.05 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 54 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |