FirePro W5100 vs Iris Graphics 550
In this comparison between FirePro W5100 and Iris Graphics 550 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5100 will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 550 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W5100
Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Iris Graphics 550 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 MB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W5100 has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 550.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 550 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 550 has 60 GB more memory, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 550 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 550 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 630 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 550 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 58% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5100 and Iris Graphics 550 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 52% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 62% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Iris Graphics 550. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Iris Graphics 550 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | Bonaire | Skylake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.97 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |