FirePro W5100 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When comparing FirePro W5100 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W5100 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W5100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W5100 has 11% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 730 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5100 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 52% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 62% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | Bonaire | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 768 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R7 260X
- FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R7 260X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon RX 550X
- FirePro W5100 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book