FirePro W5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
In this comparison between FirePro W5100 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5100 will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe MAX Graphics will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W5100
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR4x |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 MB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro W5100 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe MAX Graphics - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Iris Xe MAX Graphics - with Gen. 12 Xe.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe MAX Graphics - by 10 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 1734 MHz higher, than Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 125% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 23% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 123% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 93% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 18% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 138% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 4% more, than FirePro W5100. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 12 Xe |
Code name | Bonaire | iDG1LPDEV |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 31 October 2020 |
Pipelines | 768 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4266 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12.1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R7 260X
- FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R7 260X
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 670
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce GTX 670