FirePro W5100 vs Quadro K3000M
When choosing between FirePro W5100 and Quadro K3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5100 and Quadro K3000M.
FirePro W5100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Quadro K3000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K3000M has 50% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W5100 and Quadro K3000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 276 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
- FirePro W5100 and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 3200 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5100 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 67% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 114% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 17% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 63% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 85% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 33% more, than Quadro K3000M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Quadro K3000M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Bonaire | N14E-Q1 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 768 | 576 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 654 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 31.39 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 24 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |