FirePro W5100 vs Quadro M3000M
When comparing FirePro W5100 and Quadro M3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W5100 and Quadro M3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W5100
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Quadro M3000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M3000M has 50% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W5100 and Quadro M3000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 120 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 125% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 23% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 123% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 93% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 18% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 138% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 4% more, than FirePro W5100. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Quadro M3000M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Bonaire | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1,024 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 67.20 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 2,150 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 253 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |