FirePro W5100 vs Quadro M4000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W5100 and Quadro M4000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W5100 stacks up against Quadro M4000M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W5100
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Quadro M4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M4000M has 100% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W5100 and Quadro M4000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 45 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 and Quadro M4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 988 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 125% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 23% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 123% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 93% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 18% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 138% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 4% more, than FirePro W5100. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Quadro M4000M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Bonaire | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1,280 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 975 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 251 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |