FirePro W5100 vs Radeon HD 6850M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W5100 and Radeon HD 6850M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W5100 and Radeon HD 6850M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W5100
Radeon HD 6850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6850M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Radeon HD 6850M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 50 Watt.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6850M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W5100 has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6850M.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6850M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6850M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 355 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6850M.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6850M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 5200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6850M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6850M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 89% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 416% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 56% more, than Radeon HD 6850M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Radeon HD 6850M | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | Bonaire | Granville Pro/LP |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 March 2014 | 6 January 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 575 / 675 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,040 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 1,080.0 gflops |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / half length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |