FirePro W5100 vs Radeon HD 8870M
When choosing between FirePro W5100 and Radeon HD 8870M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5100 and Radeon HD 8870M.
FirePro W5100
Radeon HD 8870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8870M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Radeon HD 8870M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W5100 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8870M.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8870M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 8870M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 205 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8870M.
- FirePro W5100 and Radeon HD 8870M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 1500 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8870M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W5100 and Radeon HD 8870M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 73% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 92% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 67% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 114% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 17% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 63% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 85% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 33% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Radeon HD 8870M | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Bonaire | Venus |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 March 2014 | 18 December 2012 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 31.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 107 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / half length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |