FirePro W5100 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W5100 and Radeon Pro WX 3200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W5100 stacks up against Radeon Pro WX 3200, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W5100
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 30% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W5100 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 152 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 6000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5100 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 18% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Bonaire | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 26 September 2019 |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 41.44 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |