FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R7 M460
When comparing FirePro W5100 and Radeon R7 M460, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W5100 and Radeon R7 M460 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W5100
Radeon R7 M460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M460 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W5100 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M460.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M460 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M460 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M460 is 54 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 and Radeon R7 M460 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M460.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 89% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 420% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 64% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Bonaire | Meso |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 March 2014 | 21 February 2016 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 984 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1125 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Form factor | full height / half length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |