FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R9 M280X
When choosing between FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M280X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M280X.
FirePro W5100
Radeon R9 M280X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M280X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M280X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M280X - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M280X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 30 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M280X.
- FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M280X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 255% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 82% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 164% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 190% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 108% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 225% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Bonaire | Saturn XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 March 2014 | 1 February 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | Not Listed |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Form factor | full height / half length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |