FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R9 M395X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M395X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M395X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W5100
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 400% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M395X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 207 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M395X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4750 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 62% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 17% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 42% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 53% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 9% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 52% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 61% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 1% more, than FirePro W5100. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 3 |
Code name | Bonaire | Amethyst XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 413 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |