FirePro W5100 vs Tesla C2050

In this comparison between FirePro W5100 and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5100 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W5100

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	FirePro W5100	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI

Tesla C2050 has 376% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W5100 has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 356 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2050 is 77 mm longer, than FirePro W5100.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 3000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	18−20
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	4−5	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than FirePro W5100.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	24−27
QHD / 1440p	8−9	8−9
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than FirePro W5100.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100.
low / 768p	210−220	220−230
medium / 768p	180−190	190−200
ultra / 1080p	100−105	110−120
QHD / 1440p	50−55	70−75
4K / 2160p	30−33	35−40
high / 768p	140−150	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than FirePro W5100.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FirePro W5100.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	95−100	100−110
ultra / 1080p	65−70	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than FirePro W5100.
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
low / 720p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	20−22	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than FirePro W5100.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	110−120
medium / 1080p	55−60	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 6% more, than FirePro W5100.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
QHD / 1440p	9−10	10−12
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than FirePro W5100.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
medium / 768p	75−80	85−90
high / 1080p	30−35	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
QHD / 1440p	3−4	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than FirePro W5100.
high / 1080p	10−11	10−12
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	30−33	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than FirePro W5100.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro W5100.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	65−70
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than FirePro W5100.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
medium / 768p	35−40	40−45
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−12	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than FirePro W5100.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tesla C2050.

Full Specs

	FirePro W5100	Tesla C2050
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Fermi
Code name	Bonaire	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	31 March 2014	25 July 2011
Pipelines	768	448
Core clock speed	930 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	44.64	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	171 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	163 Mh/s	90 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / half length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+

FirePro W5100 vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares