FirePro W5170M vs GeForce 920A
When comparing FirePro W5170M and GeForce 920A, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W5170M and GeForce 920A is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 920A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro W5170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W5170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5170M | GeForce 920A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W5170M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce 920A uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W5170M and GeForce 920A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro W5170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce 920A - in Desktops.
- FirePro W5170M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce 920A - with Kepler 2.0.
- FirePro W5170M and GeForce 920A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5170M is 2498 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5170M. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 357% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W5170M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Dota 2 is 200% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Fortnite is 272% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in World of Tanks is 168% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5170M | GeForce 920A | |
Architecture | GCN | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Tropo | GK208B |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 915 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 | 30.53 |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.5 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |