FirePro W5170M vs GeForce GTX 275
In this comparison between FirePro W5170M and GeForce GTX 275 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5170M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 275 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W5170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W5170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5170M
GeForce GTX 275
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
896 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W5170M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 275 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 894 GB more memory, than FirePro W5170M.
FirePro W5170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 275 - in Desktops.
FirePro W5170M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 275 - with Tesla 2.0.
FirePro W5170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 275 - by 55 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W5170M is 3366 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
6−7
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
16−18
medium / 1080p
12−14
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
18−20
10−12
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−11
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W5170M and GeForce GTX 275 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
170−180
130−140
medium / 768p
140−150
100−110
ultra / 1080p
75−80
50−55
QHD / 1440p
40−45
27−30
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
110−120
75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−33
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
medium / 768p
75−80
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Dota 2 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
12−14
8−9
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
4K / 2160p
5−6
3−4
low / 720p
27−30
18−20
medium / 1080p
14−16
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
20−22
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−11
low / 720p
80−85
60−65
medium / 1080p
35−40
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Fortnite is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
QHD / 1440p
5−6
1−2
low / 720p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
21−24
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
70−75
50−55
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
high / 1080p
21−24
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
7−8
4−5
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
12−14
medium / 1080p
9−10
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Metro Exodus is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
90−95
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−105
90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
10−12
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
40−45
24−27
medium / 768p
24−27
16−18
high / 1080p
14−16
9−10
ultra / 1080p
8−9
6−7
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
40−45
ultra / 1080p
27−30
18−20
high / 768p
45−50
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
Full Specs
FirePro W5170M
GeForce GTX 275
Architecture
GCN
Tesla 2.0
Code name
Tropo
GT200B
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
2 October 2015
15 January 2009
Pipelines
640
240
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
55 nm
Texture fill rate
37.00
50.6 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
1,184 gflops
673.9 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
448 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
127.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model
5.1
4.0
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
Eyefinity
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price