FirePro W5170M vs GeForce GTX 280
In this comparison between FirePro W5170M and GeForce GTX 280 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5170M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 280 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280
FirePro W5170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W5170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5170M | GeForce GTX 280 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- FirePro W5170M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 280 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W5170M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- FirePro W5170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 280 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W5170M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 280 - with Tesla 2.0.
- FirePro W5170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 280 - by 65 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5170M is 3393 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5170M and GeForce GTX 280 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro W5170M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Dota 2 is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Fortnite is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 188% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 112% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Minecraft is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 214% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5170M | GeForce GTX 280 | |
Architecture | GCN | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Tropo | GT200 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 16 June 2008 |
Pipelines | 640 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 | 48.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 622.1 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1107 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 141.7 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W5170M vs Quadro P520
- FirePro W5170M vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro P520
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- FirePro W5170M vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- FirePro W5170M vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M