FirePro W5170M vs Quadro FX 4800
When choosing between FirePro W5170M and Quadro FX 4800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5170M and Quadro FX 4800.
Quadro FX 4800
FirePro W5170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W5170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5170M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W5170M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than FirePro W5170M.
- FirePro W5170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W5170M is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- FirePro W5170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5170M is 2900 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Battlefield 5 is 187% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Fortnite is 105% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Minecraft is 19% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 280% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5170M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Tropo | GT200B |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.00 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |