FirePro W5170M vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
In this comparison between FirePro W5170M and Radeon HD 4850 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5170M will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4850 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
FirePro W5170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W5170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5170M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- FirePro W5170M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 510 GB more memory, than FirePro W5170M.
- FirePro W5170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W5170M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- FirePro W5170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5170M is 2510 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5170M and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro W5170M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Dota 2 is 44% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Fortnite is 77% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 70% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Minecraft is 17% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 120% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5170M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5170M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | GCN | TeraScale |
Code name | Tropo | R700 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 640 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 63.68 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W5170M vs Quadro P520
- FirePro W5170M vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Quadro P520
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- FirePro W5170M vs GeForce 840A
- FirePro W5170M vs GeForce GTX 295
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce 840A
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce GTX 295