FirePro W600 vs GeForce GT 640M

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W600 and GeForce GT 640M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W600 stacks up against GeForce GT 640M, check out specs charts below.

FirePro W600 Check Price

GeForce GT 640M Check Price

GeForce GT 640M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce GT 640M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M here:

GeForce GT 640M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W600	GeForce GT 640M
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	32 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3\GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W600 has 134% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro W600 and GeForce GT 640M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro W600 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 640M - in Laptops.
FirePro W600 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 640M - with Kepler.
FirePro W600 and GeForce GT 640M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W600 is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	8−9	0−1
ultra / 1080p	5−6	0−1
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	10−12
medium / 1080p	10−11	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	12−14
medium / 1080p	14−16	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Battlefield 5 is 157% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 640M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	150−160	110−120
medium / 768p	120−130	85−90
ultra / 1080p	60−65	35−40
QHD / 1440p	30−35	−
4K / 2160p	27−30	10−11
high / 768p	90−95	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	21−24	12−14
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 640M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	85−90	70−75
medium / 768p	65−70	40−45
ultra / 1080p	35−40	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
high / 1080p	10−11	2−3
ultra / 1080p	9−10	2−3
4K / 2160p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	9−10
medium / 1080p	10−11	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	45−50
medium / 1080p	27−30	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Fortnite is 80% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
high / 1080p	14−16	2−3
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	14−16
medium / 1080p	16−18	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
low / 768p	55−60	40−45
medium / 768p	50−55	−
high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	7−8	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
high / 1080p	5−6	1−2
ultra / 1080p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	2−3
medium / 1080p	7−8	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
high / 1080p	90−95	55−60
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Minecraft is 31% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
high / 1080p	18−20	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	35−40	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
ultra / 1080p	8−9	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	3−4
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
low / 768p	30−33	7−8
medium / 768p	18−20	6−7
high / 1080p	10−12	3−4
ultra / 1080p	7−8	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce GT 640M.
low / 768p	85−90	70−75
medium / 768p	45−50	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	12−14
high / 768p	40−45	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce GT 640M.

Full Specs

	FirePro W600	GeForce GT 640M
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Cape Verde	N13P-GS
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 June 2012	22 March 2012
Pipelines	512	384
Core clock speed	750 MHz
Boost Clock		645 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	24.00
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	480.0 gflops
Length	163 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1800 - 4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 API
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		+
CUDA cores		384
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
HDMI		+
HDCP		+
Maximum VGA resolution		Up to 2048x1536
3D Blu-Ray		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	94 Mh/s	18 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
Optimus		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W600 vs GeForce GT 640M

GeForce GT 640M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares