FirePro W600 vs Quadro K1000M

When choosing between FirePro W600 and Quadro K1000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W600 and Quadro K1000M.

FirePro W600 Check Price

Quadro K1000M Check Price

Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:

Quadro K1000M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W600	Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	45 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W600 has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
FirePro W600 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro W600 and Quadro K1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro W600 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W600 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 100 MHz higher, than FirePro W600.
FirePro W600 and Quadro K1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W600 is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	8−9	0−1
ultra / 1080p	5−6	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	1−2
medium / 1080p	10−11	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	0−1
medium / 1080p	14−16	−
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	150−160	60−65
medium / 768p	120−130	27−30
ultra / 1080p	60−65	7−8
QHD / 1440p	30−35	−
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
high / 768p	90−95	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	21−24	0−1
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	85−90	45−50
medium / 768p	65−70	10−11
ultra / 1080p	35−40	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	10−11	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	21−24	0−1
medium / 1080p	10−11	−
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	21−24
medium / 1080p	27−30	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	14−16	0−1
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	0−1
medium / 1080p	16−18	0−1
low / 768p	55−60	18−20
medium / 768p	50−55	−
high / 1080p	14−16	0−1
ultra / 1080p	7−8	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	5−6	−
ultra / 1080p	4−5	−
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	14−16	0−1
medium / 1080p	7−8	−
low / 768p	95−100	75−80
high / 1080p	90−95	27−30
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
low / 720p	35−40	8−9
medium / 1080p	18−20	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	14−16	0−1
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
low / 768p	30−33	0−1
medium / 768p	18−20	−
high / 1080p	10−12	−
ultra / 1080p	7−8	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 768p	85−90	45−50
medium / 768p	45−50	14−16
ultra / 1080p	21−24	0−1
high / 768p	40−45	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in World of Tanks is 136% more, than Quadro K1000M.

Full Specs

	FirePro W600	Quadro K1000M
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Cape Verde	N14P-Q1
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	13 June 2012	1 June 2012
Pipelines	512	192
Core clock speed	750 MHz	850 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	24.00	13.60
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	326.4 gflops
Length	163 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	94 Mh/s	10 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
Optimus		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W600 vs Quadro K1000M

Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares