FirePro W600 vs Quadro K2200

In this comparison between FirePro W600 and Quadro K2200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W600 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W600 Check Price

Quadro K2200 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W600	Quadro K2200
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	68 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W600 has 10% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200.
FirePro W600 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K2200 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W600.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W600 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 296 MHz higher, than FirePro W600.
FirePro W600 and Quadro K2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K2200 is 39 mm longer, than FirePro W600.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro W600.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	8−9	18−20
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−11	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	14−16	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	27−30	60−65
medium / 1080p	14−16	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Battlefield 5 is 117% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	150−160	220−230
medium / 768p	120−130	190−200
ultra / 1080p	60−65	110−120
QHD / 1440p	30−35	75−80
4K / 2160p	27−30	40−45
high / 768p	90−95	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
medium / 768p	65−70	100−110
ultra / 1080p	35−40	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 54% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	10−11	21−24
ultra / 1080p	9−10	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	4−5	7−8
low / 720p	21−24	45−50
medium / 1080p	10−11	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	16−18	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	110−120
medium / 1080p	27−30	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 87% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	14−16	30−35
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	2−3	10−12
low / 720p	30−35	60−65
medium / 1080p	16−18	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	55−60	95−100
medium / 768p	50−55	85−90
high / 1080p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	7−8	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	5−6	10−12
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
4K / 2160p	1−2	2−3
low / 720p	14−16	35−40
medium / 1080p	7−8	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Minecraft is 18% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	35−40	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	30−33	65−70
medium / 768p	18−20	40−45
high / 1080p	10−12	21−24
ultra / 1080p	7−8	12−14
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	35−40
high / 768p	40−45	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than FirePro W600.

Full Specs

	FirePro W600	Quadro K2200
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Code name	Cape Verde	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	13 June 2012	22 July 2014
Pipelines	512	640
Core clock speed	750 MHz	1046 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	24.00	44.96
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	1,439 gflops
Length	163 mm	202 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	80.19 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	94 Mh/s	162 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		1.6 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W600 vs Quadro K2200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares