FirePro W600 vs Radeon R7 260X

In this comparison between FirePro W600 and Radeon R7 260X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W600 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 260X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W600 Check Price

Radeon R7 260X Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W600	Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 260X has 53% more power consumption, than FirePro W600.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon R7 260X has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W600.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W600 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
FirePro W600 and Radeon R7 260X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Radeon R7 260X is 7 mm longer, than FirePro W600.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	8−9	16−18
ultra / 1080p	5−6	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	18−20	30−35
medium / 1080p	10−11	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	27−30	50−55
medium / 1080p	14−16	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 88% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W600 and Radeon R7 260X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	150−160	210−220
medium / 768p	120−130	180−190
ultra / 1080p	60−65	100−110
QHD / 1440p	30−35	55−60
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−35
high / 768p	90−95	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
medium / 768p	65−70	95−100
ultra / 1080p	35−40	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 45% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	10−11	18−20
ultra / 1080p	9−10	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	4−5	6−7
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	10−11	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	16−18	24−27
ultra / 1080p	12−14	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	65−70	100−110
medium / 1080p	27−30	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 67% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	14−16	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	2−3	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	30−35	55−60
medium / 1080p	16−18	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	55−60	85−90
medium / 768p	50−55	75−80
high / 1080p	14−16	30−35
ultra / 1080p	7−8	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	5−6	10−11
ultra / 1080p	4−5	8−9
4K / 2160p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	14−16	30−35
medium / 1080p	7−8	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 116% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 13% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
low / 720p	35−40	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	30−33
medium / 1080p	12−14	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	30−33	55−60
medium / 768p	18−20	35−40
high / 1080p	10−12	20−22
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−12
4K / 2160p	6−7	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	35−40
high / 768p	40−45	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FirePro W600.

Full Specs

	FirePro W600	Radeon R7 260X
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	Cape Verde	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 June 2012	8 October 2013
Pipelines	512	896
Core clock speed	750 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	24.00	61.60
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	1,971 gflops
Length	163 mm	170 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	94 Mh/s	225 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		5.16 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W600 vs Radeon R7 260X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares