FirePro W600 vs Radeon R9 380

In this comparison between FirePro W600 and Radeon R9 380 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W600 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 380 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  FirePro W600 Radeon R9 380
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 190 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2 x 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors 6x mini-DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
  Check Price Check Price
  • Radeon R9 380 has 153% more power consumption, than FirePro W600.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • Radeon R9 380 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W600.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • FirePro W600 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 380 - with GCN.
  • FirePro W600 and Radeon R9 380 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Radeon R9 380 is 58 mm longer, than FirePro W600.
  • Memory clock speed of FirePro W600 is 3030 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 380.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 8−9 35−40
ultra / 1080p 5−6 21−24
QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
4K / 2160p 10−11
low / 720p 18−20 60−65
medium / 1080p 10−11 40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 380 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than FirePro W600.

Full Specs

  FirePro W600 Radeon R9 380
Architecture GCN 1.0 GCN
Code name Cape Verde Tonga Pro
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 13 June 2012 26 June 2015
Pipelines 512 1792
Core clock speed 750 MHz
Boost Clock 970 MHz
Transistor count 1,500 million 5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 24.00 108.6
Floating-point performance 768.0 gflops 3,476 gflops
Length 163 mm 221 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 970 MHz
Memory bandwidth 64 GB/s 182.4 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_1)
Shader Model 5.1 6.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
Vulkan 1.2.131 +
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.48 kh/s
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 94 Mh/s 404 Mh/s
Eyefinity +
HD3D +
PowerTune +
TrueAudio +
ZeroCore +
Mantle +
Design reference
Bridgeless CrossFire +
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
DisplayPort support +
CrossFire +
VCE +
DDMA audio +
Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.66 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 18 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 168.45 Sol/s
Compute units 28
Form factor full height / full length / dual slot
High bandwidth memory (HBM) -
LiquidVR +
FRTC +
  Check Price Check Price