FirePro W7000 vs Quadro K5000M
In this comparison between FirePro W7000 and Quadro K5000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7000
Quadro K5000M
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W7000 has 250% more power consumption, than Quadro K5000M.
FirePro W7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
FirePro W7000 and Quadro K5000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
FirePro W7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K5000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro W7000 is 244 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
FirePro W7000 and Quadro K5000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W7000 is 1800 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
9−10
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
30−35
24−27
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
9−10
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
low / 720p
65−70
55−60
medium / 1080p
35−40
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Battlefield 5 is 24% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
230−240
210−220
medium / 768p
200−210
180−190
ultra / 1080p
120−130
100−110
QHD / 1440p
90−95
55−60
4K / 2160p
50−55
30−35
high / 768p
170−180
140−150
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
95−100
ultra / 1080p
80−85
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
21−24
16−18
QHD / 1440p
18−20
16−18
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
40−45
medium / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Far Cry 5 is 30% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
30−35
24−27
ultra / 1080p
24−27
20−22
QHD / 1440p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
120−130
100−110
medium / 1080p
70−75
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
35−40
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
14−16
10−11
4K / 2160p
12−14
10−11
low / 720p
70−75
55−60
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
95−100
80−85
high / 1080p
40−45
30−35
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
7−8
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
3−4
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Metro Exodus is 21% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
FirePro W7000 and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−11
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
75−80
55−60
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
high / 1080p
24−27
20−22
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
4K / 2160p
8−9
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FirePro W7000.
Full Specs
FirePro W7000
Quadro K5000M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Code name
Pitcairn
N14E-Q5
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
13 June 2012
1 June 2012
Pipelines
1280
1344
Core clock speed
950 MHz
706 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
76.00
67.31
Floating-point performance
2,432 gflops
1,615 gflops
Length
242 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4800 MHz
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
153.6 GB/s
96 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
285 Mh/s
51 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
6 Mh/s
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price