FirePro W7000 vs Quadro K620M

In this comparison between FirePro W7000 and Quadro K620M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:

Main Specs

  FirePro W7000 Quadro K620M
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 30 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin None
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • FirePro W7000 has 1066% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
  • FirePro W7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
  • FirePro W7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
  • FirePro W7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
  • FirePro W7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
  • Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 79 MHz higher, than FirePro W7000.
  • FirePro W7000 and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of FirePro W7000 is 2800 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 21−24 3−4
ultra / 1080p 12−14 1−2
QHD / 1440p 6−7 0−1
4K / 2160p 5−6
low / 720p 40−45 14−16
medium / 1080p 24−27 5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro K620M.

Full Specs

  FirePro W7000 Quadro K620M
Architecture GCN 1.0 Maxwell
Code name Pitcairn GM108
Type Workstation Mobile workstation
Release date 13 June 2012 1 March 2015
Pipelines 1280 384
Core clock speed 950 MHz 1029 MHz
Boost Clock 1124 MHz
Transistor count 2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 76.00 17.98
Floating-point performance 2,432 gflops 863.2 gflops
Length 242 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 4800 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 153.6 GB/s 14.4 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_1) 12
Shader Model 5.1 5
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.126
CUDA +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 285 Mh/s 92 Mh/s
Optimus +
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 6 Mh/s
Form factor full height / full length
StereoOutput3D +
DisplayPort count 4
Dual-link DVI support +
Display Port 1.2
nView Display Management +
  Check Price Check Price