FirePro W7000 vs Tesla C2050

In this comparison between FirePro W7000 and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7000 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W7000 Check Price

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	FirePro W7000	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price

FirePro W7000 has 47% more power consumption, than Tesla C2050.
FirePro W7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W7000 has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W7000 is 376 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
FirePro W7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2050 is 6 mm longer, than FirePro W7000.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W7000 is 1800 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−11
QHD / 1440p	6−7	4−5
4K / 2160p	5−6	4−5
low / 720p	40−45	35−40
medium / 1080p	24−27	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	27−30	24−27
QHD / 1440p	12−14	8−9
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
low / 720p	65−70	60−65
medium / 1080p	35−40	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Battlefield 5 is 14% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W7000 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	220−230
medium / 768p	200−210	190−200
ultra / 1080p	120−130	110−120
QHD / 1440p	90−95	70−75
4K / 2160p	50−55	35−40
high / 768p	170−180	150−160
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	80−85	70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	20−22
QHD / 1440p	18−20	18−20
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
low / 720p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	27−30	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	70−75	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	35−40	30−35
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
QHD / 1440p	14−16	10−12
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	70−75	60−65
medium / 1080p	40−45	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	100−110	95−100
medium / 768p	95−100	85−90
high / 1080p	40−45	35−40
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
QHD / 1440p	7−8	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	12−14	10−12
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	3−4	2−3
low / 720p	40−45	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Metro Exodus is 13% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	16−18	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	40−45	35−40
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	75−80	65−70
medium / 768p	45−50	40−45
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050.

Full Specs

	FirePro W7000	Tesla C2050
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Pitcairn	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	13 June 2012	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1280	448
Core clock speed	950 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	2,800 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	76.00	32.14
Floating-point performance	2,432 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	242 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	285 Mh/s	90 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	6 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price

FirePro W7000 vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares